Joe Boxer – Classic Cotton Boxer – White – Medium

023

image

Material: 100% Cotton and soft as you’d expect it! (You might suggest it’s a function of this pair’s pre-collection age, but it has always been super-soft.)
Aesthetic: You can’t really go wrong with a classic white, plus a true Joe Boxer vintage white-waistband-with-bold-black-text waistband – unless, of course, the pair has aged to the point of looking thin and ragged, which this pair somewhat has. Still, if you can get your hands on a crisp, fresh pair of classic white boxer-briefs like this pair, I’d say go for it!
Waistband: Feeling-wise, what you expect of most waistbands. Sits right up at or beneath the waist; good size.
Pouch: The one downside for having a truly classic white (boxer) brief look is that there’s essentially no shape whatsoever to the pouch – it’s super flat. The one upside to this pair is that it’s not entirely a true traditional vertical fly – the inner fly opening is a looser, non-trimmed horizontal opening not unlike the inner fly opening in the Jack Adams Core Cycle Trunk. However, while the inner opening of the fly has easy access, the outer opening is NOT, at least not by design. The opening is small and attaches too far up the “V” structure of the brief, making this more similar to the AC Tagless Brief. At least, it was – as you can see from the photos below, I’ve made a modification to the pair. Back in my late teens, I was as annoyed with the inaccessible fly opening as I am now, but I still loved the overall feel of the pair and the inner fly opening, so I decided to take a pair of scissors to the pair. Snip snip! You can see now that the right and left “triangles” formed by the trim/piping are no longer the same size. I wouldn’t do this to any pair I’ve purchased recently, or at least any pair that’s worth more than $6 or $8 – I think this is only a real option for underwear that you’d buy in bulk and isn’t designed to stand out.

image

Backside: Like the front, rather flat, though there’s at least a slight curve between the legs.
Legs: At this point in time, they’re getting worn and loose, but they were similar to the Core Cycle Trunk originally, if a bit shorter.
Overall: 2.5/5 – I do love sleeping in these, and they’re good to wear for a day in the office as well, but they’re really hard to find at this point, (the closest I’ve found are here,)and you can do sooooo much better pouch-wise anyway.
Great for: Sleepwear
Good for: Everyday wear, Loungewear

Jack Adams – Core Cycle Trunk – Orange – Medium

022

image

Material: 60% Cotton, 40% Polyester, but all you feel is the cotton, so it’s a really nice, traditional feel IMO.
Aesthetic: A strong solid color is complimented by a bold white waistband with black text and a slim black stripe all the way around.
Waistband: Overall, very comfy typical waistband that sits below the waist.
Pouch: In my mind, there are three main things to think about when designing the front of men’s underwear: keeping everything comfortable & separate, promoting your package (physically and aesthetically), and granting ease of access when nature calls. Unfortunately, it’s often very hard to balance all three, specifically balancing the third against the first two. Why? Well, if you want to make a fly, the historically you either have to include two layers of overlapping fabric (the traditional vertical fly on classic whitey tighties) which would generally promote flatness from the extra layer, or have an optionally closable slit on a flat front (the sometimes-buttoned fly of true boxer shorts) which is flat because having such an opening in a contoured pair would just have your junk falling out all the time. Many designers are just forgoing the fly nowadays since most men don’t use flies anyway. Brands have also tried traditional vertical flies with highly contoured pouches, which I’ve already detailed as somewhat defeating the point because those flies are nearly impossible to navigate, (certainly can’t be done one-handed,) and often hurt to have your dick sticking through. Well, the horizontal (“H”) fly is one really, really great way to eliminate the “fly challenge”. An H-Fly is inherently easy to navigate, (assuming neither limiting hem is too stiff,) and it allows the lower panel of the fly to still be a single-layer, nicely shaped section of fabric – and Jack Adams’ Core line is an amazing example of a H-fly. Like the AC brief linked above, the inside hem of the fly is simply a semi-loose trim-/pipe-less edge of fabric, and the outside hem isn’t so high to make it difficult to use (unlike the AC brief where the outside hem is too far right). And while I’ve had some athletic boxer briefs from Jockey that also have H-flies, this Jack Adams pair had a much more contoured pouch, plus was made from a much more “everyday” fabric than the Jockey pairs were. This combination was why I ultimately bought three more Core pairs – another Cycle Trunk, a shorter-legged Boxer Brief, and some Long Johns (which unfortunately compromised the lower support of the pouch somewhat).

image

Backside: Nothing incredible about the backside here, but it’s just tight enough to give you a bit of shape. The vertical center seam comes in just a bit, too.
Legs: Very good length, IMO, and also just tight enough to not feel uncomfortable while still staying up against your skin. I mentioned the Boxer Brief earlier, which is still nice in most manners, but the legs on that pair are short enough that they roll up often and actually do start feeling tight around my thighs.
Overall: 4.5/5 – the only reasons I don’t give this the full 5/5 “I totally recommend this!” is that 1) I can see some people note liking the fabric, and 2) I can’t recommend that something that’s no longer available! I’m highly frustrated about that second point. At the very least, it seems that Jack Adams is making new trunks and new boxer briefs that have very similar cuts to the Core line, though none with the 60% Cotton/40% Polyester blend.
Great for: Everyday wear, Loungewear, Sexy wear
Good for: Activewear, Sleepwear, Sex wear

image

jockstrapcentral:

Photos: Jockstrap Central model Zack Acland in the new orange Full Kit Gear Service Shorts.

These full service skin-tight fetish shorts have handy front and rear zippers and a handy front pocket for holding your stash. Available in all the original fetish colors and now orange!

Get Full Kit Gear at Jockstrap Central

Like the previous reblog, these shorts look like a lot of fun too, for very similar reasons! The pouch here is micro-mesh, four-way-stretch fabric, which helps explain the great bulge looks when you’re all zipped up. The white piping separating the orange of the pouch from the black of the rest of the pair really makes the orange “pop” too, which I’m definitely a fan of. I’m a little wary of how that zipper will feel against your junk, though…. I hope there’s a little zipper-protection-flap on the inside of that pouch. Looks so, but hard to tell for sure. Anyway, moving around back, we get another zipper-close back slit, so I’m all for it. The inner-thigh-and-hole-highlighting extra swath of white-piped orange fabric is also a nice visual touch. I’m all for getting these Service Shorts, too!

jockstrapcentral:

Photos: Jockstrap Central model Matthew Eldracher in our newly launched Cellblock 13 Octane Jock Trunks and Fetish Shorts. Matthew is in the grey and red versions. Also available is yellow and blue which we got on our model Zack Acland which I’ll be posting soon.

These hot trunks and shorts are top fetish drawer material and perfect for the exhibitionist with their full access front and  open back design of the jock trunk and zippered rear of the fetish short.

More more Jockstrap Central’s exclusive photos and to snag a pair of the octane shorts, visit Jockstrap Central.

www.jockstrapcentral.com

Okay, here’s a REAL reblog review for y’all. =-)

These “Jock Trunks” and “Fetish Shorts” from Cellblack13 are a fantastic example of the kind of naughty fun the Los Angeles brand is known for! These are made from Polyurethane, Nylon, and Spandex, and both feature a really alluring front pouch design that initially looks like a H-fly until you notice that both sides of the pouch can unzip, and then – you’re all out for the world to see! The “Jock Trunks” also have a backside typical of jock-trunks (or jock-briefs) while the longer-leg boxer-like shorts have a smaller (and, IMO, more inviting) back slit similar to the one found in my older pair of AC FUKR Access Boxers. I’m not sure if my skin would enjoy the material, but if so I’d be all over those Fetish Shorts!

jockstrapcentral:

Just arrived at Jockstrap Central: Cellblock 13 Smuggler Jock-Packs.

Neoprene jocks with built in hip gear bags with two outer pockets for your phone, lube and poppers plus secret inner pocket for your money.

It’s the perfect piece of kit for your next underwear party, fetish party, club night or circuit party.

The pouch is made with a stunning textured rubber with soft inner layer that hugs your junk. In black with detailing in your favorite fetish colors – blue, red, yellow or white.

See Jockstrap Central model Zack Acland in all the new gear and snag some for yourself:

www.jockstrapcentral.com

Alright, time for another reblog review! And this is…

…….UUUHHHHHHHHHH……

/fin

2(x)ist – Pima Cotton Boxer – White – Medium

021

image

Material: 100% pure cotton, and boy does it show! It’s comfy enough that I’ve bought two other pairs of this, one another white and one a blue.
Aesthetic: Honestly, probably some of the least exciting-looking underwear I own. Someone who wears this has to be really confident to sell the look well. I generally think solid colors can be good since they let other aspect of a pair stand out – but when you’re talking about true boxer shorts, the general looseness means nothing stands out unless you try drawing attention to it.
Waistband: A bit bunch-ier than all of the other waistbands I’ve seen. Not really uncomfortable in any way, but if you don’t like any more material than necessary, you might not like it. Still, great sizing, and sits on the waist.
Pouch: Or, rather, the lack thereof. It’s a true boxer, so it’s entirely loose and flat. The material is super-soft, though, so it’s still a great feeling against your junk nonetheless.
Backside: I mean, it’s a true boxer, so there’s not much to write about here either. The seam just on the sides of the back panel look very nice, though, a good frame for your backside.
Legs: Good length and moderately loose – not so tight that it stops feeling like a true boxer, but still slim enough that it won’t feel bulky in your pants.
Overall: 3.5/5 – as an average. If you like true boxer shorts, then I could see this as a 4.5/5, but if you don’t, then I guess it’s a 2/5. All depends on the kids of support and breathing room you like in your underwear. Either way, I definitely love the material (hence having three pairs).
Great for: Sleepwear, Loungewear
Good for: Everyday wear

Cocksox – CX05 Thong – Risky Red//Gold (Yellow) – Medium

020

image

Material: 92% Supplex, 8% Lycra, which comes out to a very nice compromise between cotton-y soft and low-friction smooth.
Aesthetic: The simple, solid color for the thong gives a sleek and alluring look with a classy interjection from the Cocksox logo across one hip strap.
Waistband: I would in theory put “NA” since there’s no dedicated waistband at all – it’s just the regular fabric with the same hem around all edges – but I realize I should at least comment on the first around your waist: it’s good! Good stretch, good fit, sits right on the hips but clearly can be worn higher.
Pouch: The discovery of the CX05 pouch was a revelation to me way back when, and it was one of (if not THE?) first pair of under that I bought multiples of. Great shape on its own, and the combination of the shape and the stretchiness of the fabric means it’s one of the few pairs that can easily accommodate a full (or at least nearly-full) erection without pulling away from the skin and “fighting back” as it were, to the point that regular-grip masturbation is possible. Hey, I said this was technically an NSFW blog, didn’t I? You’re gonna get some comments that a few people might find TMI!
Backside/String: The back panel is pretty nice, and eases the thong strap down between your cheeks smoothly instead of dropping in sharply. The strap itself if somewhat wide, so that you’ll definitely feel it between your cheeks, but the material makes it a very comfortable insertion. It comes nicely up close to your hole, too, so if you’re looking for a thong because you love that feeling, this is a great pair for you.
Legs: NA
Other: While the CX05 is one of Cocksox’ best-sellers, neither of the colors I own are in production any more.
Overall: 5/5 – get this pair! Unless you don’t like thongs. And if you simply haven’t tried them before, this is a great first thong!
Great for: Everyday wear, Activewear, Sleepwear, Sexy wear
Good for: NA

Andrew Christian – Fly Tagless Brief – Red – Medium

019

image

Material: 95% Cotton, 5% Spandex, comfortable enough but nothing to write home about.
Aesthetic: AC’s tribute to the traditional brief, taking the design and giving it a STRONG “pop” with red bordered by black. The waistband adds a nice highlight of white, too, giving the pair a confident look.
Waistband: Feeling-wise, what you expect of most waistbands. Sits between the hips and waist; good size.
Pouch: The pouch includes a traditional vertical fly while also having a very prominent front bulge as each panel of the fly has a half-seam that starts from the point of the pouch and goes down from there. This gives it a very similar design, in theory, to the Aussiebum WonderYears brief. The AC Fly Tagless Briefs also has a relatively stiff, short fly opening on the front of the brief. A highly important difference, though, comes on the inside of the fly, where the inside opening is both much longer and much more flexible than the front opening as AC chose to not mimic the border trim/piping on the inside.

image

The fly still isn’t navigable with just one hand, thanks to the front opening, but the fly is at least usable since the shearing sensation seen in the WonderYears isn’t present. If you want, you can even forego keeping your wille in the inside pouch panel, having it rest in the outside pouch panel alone so it’s easier to fetch when you need it – the inside pouch panel is lightweight and soft enough that you won’t notice the slight bit of bunching this setup would require.
Backside: As would be expected from AC, the ass is shaped very well – tight enough to keep you held together nicely without being limiting, a nice little dip between the cheeks, and a tag that’s printed on the back fabric in a way that always feels dry and generally unnoticeable.
Legs: A tiny bit on the tight side, but not in a truly uncomfortable way – more just what you might expect from a pair of briefs.
Overall: 4/5 – a nice mix between the traditional brief and AC’s fun, kinda-loud nature that would be a great addition to anyone’s collection.
Great for: Activewear, Sexy wear
Good for: Everyday wear, Loungewear

image

brunomenswear:

#NewArrivals by Bruno Mens Wear

¡Envío *GRATIS!
*Aplica solo a Envíos a todo México.

#Whatsapp 271 124 5213

Modelo: BODY NA-TS

Confeccionado en licra Spandex color negro en bulge, con detalle de tirantes en elástico satinado del mismo tono al pecho, abdomen y entre pierna y unión en pecho en material sintetico.
Precio: $599.90 MXN

Hacemos envíos exprés a TODO México y el resto del mundo. 📦 ✈️ 📪

Con mucho gusto RECIBIMOS sus órdenes de compra al correo electrónico: ventas@brunomenswear.com.mx donde te atenderemos CORDIALMENTE.

#COMPRAmodamexicana

No dejes pasar la oportunidad de lucir SEXY y sentirte cómodo con #BrunoMensWear

Hhhhhhoooooly hell…. I’m not normally in to anything that looks harness-y, I’m not big in the leather or BDSM communities, but this thing looks HELLA SLEEK. I’m liking the looks of the chest straps, with the thin shiny straps and the diamond look… But I gotta talk about the more-traditional-underwear-area too. It looks like the pouch is attached to jockstrap-like straps that help highlight your cheeks behind, which is nice, but what’s really getting me right now is the lack of a waistband. I like full-body “underwear” because it almost always forgoes the waistband, leaving a smooth area of fabric all up the hips and torso sides, but seeing a smooth exposed area of skin in that same place really turns me on… The lack of a disruptive waistband in that area is just really sensual to me, I’m really tempted to get this [one Mexican Dollar (Peso) is currently about five and a half cents, so that price is around $32.40 USD…]