Tag: Print

Good Devil – GD1018 C-String – White Leopard – One Size

103

Material: 100% Polyester, which doesn’t necessarily sound great as it’s all synthetic, but it’s honestly done quite well! Not listed here is the fact that a huge component of this underwear is a set of stiff wires that provide the main support (for the pair, not for your junk).
Aesthetic: Skimpy and frisky! The fact that it’s just a pouch means you’re revealing about as much skin as possible, and the white leopard print adds to the “wild side” look all the more. Then, if you do look around back, you can usually see the “string” wire peeking out from the top of your cheeks, which further compounds the feeling of naughty playfulness.
Pouch: I’ll talk just about the pouch itself here, and the wire “string” support in the next section. The pouch here is cool to the touch, (which is almost always very nice,) lightweight, and quite breathable for being 100% synthetic. It also has a great shape to it, though it does include a little bit too much space on the lower end of the pouch before it narrows between your legs. (You can see the looseness of the lower pouch in the second photo above.) This isn’t too much of an issue, and might be for the better for breathability’s sake, but it’s a bit odd. Overall, though, very nice pouch.
String: With no waistband and no straps, all pouch underwear needs some way of actually staying on your person. Usually this is accomplished by having the ring of the main opening either have a drawstring to narrow it around the base of your junk or snap in place there. Instead, Good Devil here has designed an entirely rigid framework that covers your crotch with a single thin wire slipping between your thighs and butt cheeks in such a way that the front and back of the wires – in theory – grip your torso from both sides to stay in place. In practice, this works well enough, and is usually aided by the fact that the “string” wire in back also is simply held in place by being wedged between your cheeks – basically, a very solid G-string. (And yes, the stiff wire is covered in fabric all the way around so it’s relatively comfortable.) Ideally, the lowest part of the wire would stay right up against the underside of your torso, but I’ve found that it tends to slide down half an inch or so, giving a slightly open feeling between your legs; part of this may be due to the fact that the tapering from the pouch loop to the single wire happens somewhat slowly, pushing back against your thighs a little bit right where they’re trying to meet your crotch. This can be a tad uncomfortable since you can’t fully bring your thighs together without the wire digging in a little. Also, depending on your rear, the tip of the “string” wire may stick up a bit too much, which can interfere with your pants and/or your seat back if you’re sitting down. Still, I think this is a very fun design, and one I’ve worn several times on days I just feel like exciting myself a little bit.
Overall: 3/5 – I think this is a very situational pair, and I’m sure there will probably be a number of guys who just don’t like the idea of stiff underwear (or of something, stiff or not, going between their cheeks). This pair isn’t for those guys, obviously, but I think it’d be fun for people to try out if they can get one.
Great for: Sexy wear
Good for: Everyday wear(?)

Everyone deserves to just sit back and have fun now and then, right? That’s the feel I get from a pair like these with the bright colors an cartoon fruit. =-D The pair has relatively short legs, so I personally might not like wearing it as much as other people might, but it overall looks pretty darn comfortable! The fabric seems soft enough, no big problems with the leg hems, and the pouch has a fairly nice if not super-pronounced shape – all in all, probably a nice pair for everyday wear. And of course, it looks so fun! Sure to bring a smile to the face of anyone who happens to get the opportunity to see your bananas. 😉

Side note: apparently this is the first time I’ve featured Supawear on the blog… I should look into them at some point soon I guess!

Box Menswear – F**k You Boxer Briefs – print – Medium

096

Material: 95% Cotton, 5% Elastane, and definitely comfortable! The material stretches nicely, and largely just molds itself to your shape. You can feel the fabric there, but it’s not constraining in any way, and has just a hint of cool feeling to it.
Aesthetic: Not sure exactly how to put into words the aesthetic here, as this pair looks somewhat newspaper-ish from a distance, with the brand text almost looking like a headline along the waistband. Between the print, you can also make out the hems fairly clearly, which is a little visually distracting, and not in a good way. Still, you get to read the “F**k You” text if you take a closer look, and getting to take a closer look at a pair of underwear in wear is always nice! (The print is not censored like I’m doing here.)
Waistband: A bit taller than most waistbands, consistent in that sense with the waistband on the Box briefs. It’s a little bit of a softer construction, though, and a bit more plain on the inside too. Generally wears at or slightly below your waist.
Pouch: As with many boxer-briefs, the pouch is stretched out and spacier near the bottom where it connects to the legs than the pouch on comparable briefs are. Interestingly, though, I like this pouch better because the fabric and stretch and mold around your junk better than the brief I previously reviewed. In other words,the pouch here can still provide support around the lower areas quite well, and more so based on conforming to your junk rather than conforming your junk to it.
Backside: The backside here does give your cheeks some good definition on the underside, and the print is nice to look at, but I would say here that the pair doesn’t do an A+ job of giving your cheeks a good overall shape – IMO, my rump definitely looks bigger in the somewhat-flabby way in this pair. That said, it still feels very good to wear!
Legs: I like the length on these, and they’re generally pretty comfortable, including well-made hems at the end of each legs. The comfort of those hems has maybe allowed them to more-easily roll up, which they will do a fair amount, as shown below.
Other: Yes, they do have a pair that says “F**k Me” on it too. That one is typically sold out, while this one is typically not.
Overall: 3.5/5 – While I’m only giving these a fairly average rating, largely based on the less-flattering backside and rolling-up leg hems, I still quite like how these feel to wear. Definitely a nice pair to wear, and if you can get the “F**k Me” instead of the “F**k You” pair, all the more fun!
Great for: Loungewear
Good for: Everyday wear, Sleepwear

The weather’s getting warmer here in the Northern Hemisphere, so let’s take a look at some swimwear, shall we? =-D

This here is a Nasty Pig “Label Bikini”, which is obviously utterly plastered with the Nasty Pig name all over it, so there’s no confusion as to the brand. That is, unless someone looking at it hasn’t heard of the brand before and just thinks it’s a description of you!

The drawstring, though white, acts as a splash of color for an honestly somewhat chaotic, muddy-ish design. I like the more traditional application of a drawstring, where the string necessarily comes out of the pair on the visible side of the waistband, but there’s a recent trend for brands to make their drawstrings exit on the inside of the waistband, which I personally think is just entirely counterproductive. I guess people think it’s too suggestive to have something flopping around in front of your crotch? …okay, yes that’s entirely understandable if stated only like that. But I don’t think anyone is going to confuse drawstrings for a dick. I think some guys think it’s rude to have *anything* that draws peoples’ attention to your crotch. But yeah, my personal opinion is that it’s impossible to tighten the waistband properly if your hands have to be inside the pair to do the tying!

Ah well. Speaking of waistbands, this pair has theirs entirely hidden in the main material, as it’s supposedly a 1-inch tall waistband, but there’s clearly no distinction between waistband and the rest of the pair here. I kind like that look on swim briefs (e.g. a Speedo-ish look) but it’s not as good on swim squarecuts, trunks, or shorts though.

No clue at all what brand these boxers are, but I think they look nice! They’re a very traditional look, with a simple pattern on what appears to be a slightly stiffer, sheet-ier kind of fabric – definitely not the traditional briefs-style fabric or a super-soft, almost-formless cotton. I imagine it’s almost a little slick to the touch, in a way. The waistband also looks like it could be a little on the crinkle-y side, especially with the kind of fabric I’m thinking of.

I have a pair of boxers myself from Jockey that I think are comparable to this pair in terms of fabric, but it’s just a guess. It’s the kind of boxers you might think of for a 9-to-5 office-worker kind of stereotype. (My Jockey boxers even have a button-close pocket in back! A bit weird, but kinda fun.)

Even if the fabric is a little on the stiffer side, these boxers were apparently designed with enough of a front to give a fairly good look to the pouch here as this daddy is wearing it! He definitely seems to be providing a nice shape up front, and he looks comfortable wearing it too, which is of course always the most important part. It kinda looks like the pair has a fly, but it’s hard to tell exactly; between the angle and the lighting, I can’t see an obvious button, and the fly isn’t obviously semi-open either, which can often happen with boxers and similar things when the way you’re standing causes the two halves of the fly to fold differently.

AussieBum – Hibiscus Trunk – Red – M

083

Material: 90% Cotton, 10% Elastane, and incredibly smooth and comfy! Now, after the first trip through the wash, the pair lost a little bit of its sleekness and such, but this is splitting hairs – it’s still quite lightweight and relatively low-friction as cotton blends go. Great amount of stretch. The only drawback to this fabric is that it seems to like to (visually) bunch up a lot – it took forever to get good pictures even though I never needed to provide any significant stretching to make the fabric lie flat on me (and could never get it perfect in the back view).
Aesthetic: Really playful! I love the flower print. Honestly, I had wanted the pink version instead of this red (and blue) version, but I still love the look. In addition to the print pattern, there are a bunch of seams on this pair that you don’t really feel at all but can definitely see, helping to visually emphasize the pouch, length of the legs from the front, and the curve of your cheeks in back.
Waistband: Fairly typical! Not much to say.
Pouch: Such a good pouch… Nicely shaped so that it’s separate from the thighs, sticks out forward enough, and the give of the fabric gives a nice amount of motion without feeling loose at all. Honestly, similar to the BodyDenim pair I reviewed a long time ago.
Backside: Very nice! The print pattern and seams give it a bunch of visual interest, and I think the seams also help shape the backside well, giving it a nicely round look. There’s also an impressive separation between your cheeks with this pair! Don’t worry, it doesn’t feel like a wedgie at all – just looks a bit like it (in a good way)!
Legs: Despite being called a “trunk”, the legs here actually have a nice length IMO (and, to be fair, in the item description on the site, it says “brief and long leg styles”, so I guess this is actually one of the “long leg”s).
Overall: 5/5 – while I’m not sure if this pair rises to the level of being a “favorite”, I can’t really find anything wrong with this pair either! Heck, it’s overall very similar to the BodyDenim I mentioned earlier, which was also a 5/5 and a favorite, with an honestly better waistband now to boot… I guess this pair will probably join the ranks of favorites for me soon, it’s just not well-established in my mind yet.
Great for: Everyday wear, Loungewear, Sexy wear
Good for: Sleepwear, Activewear

Despite how prominent the logo is on these briefs, I honestly have no clue what this brand is! The closest I can find by just Googling “ZK underwear” is ZukuLife, but nowhere am I seeing anything labeled as ZukuLife that has this panda-like logo… Which is sad, because I really want to verify what kind of pair this is and potentially buy some! One of my readers has contacted me and found the real brand – “Haus Zuk” from Germany! Thank you!

Camo is almost always a fun print to wear, and these briefs use it surprisingly well! The bold black and white striping on the waistband is a nice contrast to the camo of the main fabric, and even with the camo print, this model’s bulge is still quite obvious! I also appreciate how this guy is a bit more of an “average Joe” in build and really seems to own his otter-bear-ish body, because he look amazing in this pair.

Andrew Christian – MASSIVE Animal Attraction Brief – Animal Attraction print – M

068

Material: 87% Polyester, 13% Spandex, this fabric feels like it can’t decide if it wants to be stretchy or not. This is probably a difference between the black base material and the golden overlay on the outside, with the shiny gold probably the limiting factor. The black base material is actually quite see-through if you hold the pair up, meaning it’s rather lightweight, but you can’t really tell while wearing the pair.
Aesthetic: Flashy and exotic! I mean, there’s not much else to say about it – though I will point out that the Greek-style patterning on the waistband is rather cool too. For much of this review, be comparing this pair to the Justin Case Zebra brief I reviewed a long time ago, for obvious aesthetic reasons.
Waistband: Pretty typical for waistbands, especially fashion waistbands. By that, I meant it’s a nice, fairly soft elastic material, though maybe not quite as stretchy as some other waistbands. It won’t cut in to you by any means, and you won’t notice it much, but it might be slightly less forgiving in the sizing that the JC Zebra brief does. The tag in the back is somewhat large, and while it’s not stiff, it’s not super-soft either. Fashion-forward as this pair is, the waistband sits on your hips.
Pouch: This is quite a pouch! Which I guess is expected of the MASSIVE line. It’s got an incredible shape, and the relative stiffness of the material means this shape will hold no matter what you do! On one hand, it’s an excellent visual, very good at promoting your junk whether you’re standing or sitting, and fun to grab; on the other hand, you are forced to wear your willie downward, and I think it might get a big problematic if you were to get a boner.
Backside: Not too much to say here! The material definitely makes it feel like it’s holding your cheeks in. It does provide a tad bit more coverage than the Zebra brief does.
Legs: Despite the fabric overall being a tad bit on the stiff side, I thin the leg openings on this pair are a hair more forgiving that those on the Zebra briefs, though it’s definitely not an incredibly large difference.
Overall: 3/5 – all in all, there are places where the JC Zebra brief is better, and places where this AC Animal Attraction brief is better, basically putting these on balance with each other from what I think is an objective standpoint. From a subjective standpoint, one of the things I personally care about the most is how well it supports your junk, and while the JC Zebra brief has softer and more forgiving fabric, the pouch itself is still pretty flat and thus not as good for general wear, IMO, even if the pair feels more obvious; the legs are also (somewhat surprisingly) more forgiving, which is great for my thighs. Also, this AC pair is simply flashier too, so those together are why I’m giving this pair the 3/5 to just barely edge out the 2.5/5 of the Zebra brief.
Great for: Sexy wear
Good for: Everyday wear

I feel I was very luck to find pics of two very different guys wearing apparently the same AC camo brief! Or, maybe – the exact pattern of the camo is different, but IDK if that means these are from entirely different production runs, or if there was simply no attempt made to keep the exact pattern consistent.

Anyway, this is a fairly basic AC brief as far as cut goes. This brief is no longer available from the AC site (of course), but from what I can tell on other sites that had previously sold it and not taken the info down, I believe these briefs use the “Show-It” design (as opposed to the “Almost Naked” design) – though I can’t find what the fabric is.

Still, both of these men are wearing the pair very well, and it look comfy enough!