Xtremen – Classic Stripes Boxer Brief – Red, White, and Blue – Medium

029

Material: 80% Nylon, 10% Polyester, 10% Spandex, definitely feels smooth, sleek, and synthetic. Not as lightweight as it probably could be, though, and not incredibly breathable.
Aesthetic: The stripes pattern makes it quite a looker! Especially with the changing angle of the stripes on the pouch. I’m not a huge fan of the horizontal pattern inserted between the thighs, though – the discontinuities are disconcerting.
Waistband: A little on the tight side, and not the softest material either. Folds over fairly easily.
Pouch: Has some contour to give your boys a little bit of room, but overall there’s not much there – it keeps you in place by not giving you much room to fill out. Nice if you’re exercising, especially with the cool-feeling, low-friction fabric, and also alright if you’re gonna be sitting most of your day. Aside from that, though, not much to write home about.
Backside: Like the rest of the pair, it’s on the tighter side, and this is one pair that really just holds everything down instead of meeting your cheeks in the middle. It’s tight enough that the seams (which are already visually a bit too obvious) don’t lie fully against the skin, which shows just how taught the backside is.
Legs: Fairly good, but again a little on the tight side for my liking. Fairly good length, though, especially since the fabric is relatively low-friction.
Overall: 2.5/5 – not bad, but you can do better, I think. Looks better than it feels. I’m wondering if it would have benefited me to get a large instead of a medium – would maybe solve a lot of the tightness issues, but don’t think it would have solved the waistband folding or the general pouch shape.
Great for: Activewear, Sexy wear
Good for: Everyday wear

Jack Adams – Flyer Thong – Red – Medium

028

image

Material: 85% Polyester, 15% Elastane, it certainly feels like a pair meant for fun! Smooth and relatively lightweight, there’s a certain energy in this pair that comes from how the fabric feels on your package.
Aesthetic: Now this is a looker! You can tell the fabric is sleek just by looking at it, and the color is quite bold! (And is on all versions of this cut, patterned or solid.) It reprises the typical Jack Adams waistband that I previously mentioned with the Core Cycle Trunk, which looks even better here with the color and material of this pair. You also have a very attractive opening between the waistband and pouch on this pair…
Waistband: Overall, very comfy typical waistband that sits below the waist.
Pouch: Overall, a great pouch that does a pretty good job of cupping your junk comfortably. I think the peekaboo opening may make the pouch loose once the pair gets old, but right now it holds you in place fairly well. The lower part of the pouch holds your balls securely even while the upper part of the pouch feels roomy and motion-friendly so it’s not constraining at all. While it looks great in the promotional material, you can see on me that it doesn’t fully sit in the creases where your legs meet your torso, but it’s unlike the Pride G-Slinger in that, as mentioned, it still comes up under your balls correctly – you won’t feel at any risk of things hanging out, so because at least the crotch itself fits correctly, I don’t mind the slight “lack of fit” higher up nearly as much.
String: This g-string seems to have the opposite problem that the Pride G-Slinger did in that the length of the string is a bit too short instead of too long – while the string is comfortable enough overall, over time you might feel like it’s occasionally too tight and cutting down into your crack, up against your tailbone.
Overall: 3.5/5 – I was considering 4, but the slight cutting feeling of the string against the tailbone means I can’t recommend this too highly, since it’s not great for long-term wear in general. 5/5 for looks, though!
Great for: Sexy wear, Sex wear
Good for: Everyday wear, Activewear

Pride USA – G-Slinger – Orange – Medium

027

image

Material: 95% Cotton, 5% Spandex, relatively comfortable and soft.
Aesthetic: The “corner triangle cutouts” are a very fun touch to this pair, though I think the effect would have been better if the hue was fully saturated – it’s ever-so-washed-out by design, so there’s something to be desired in the “fun” department even as the cut is somewhat teasing with the peekaboo corners there.
Waistband: Small and same general design as the string itself, meaning it’s very comfy.

image

Pouch/String: The shape of the pouch here is fairly nice, but the overall construction is a bit suspect. When worn lower as I think it was designed to, you can see that the edges of the pouch hover are pushed away from the skin with even the slightest bit of weight/growth from your junk (left panel). At the same time, the string is a great size around but too long overall, making it obscenely loose (center panel). You can in theory solve both problems but pulling the waistband higher, but then to run into the problem that the edges of the pouch no longer correctly sit in the creases where your legs meet your torso (right panel), which both looks weird and gives an awkward feeling of undress.
Overall: 2/5 – maybe someone with the right body type / hip shape might be able to pull this g-string off better, but just on my experience, I wouldn’t recommend it.
Great for: NA
Good for: Sexy wear, Sex wear, Sleepwear

Premium Xpression – Boxer Brief – True Red – Medium

026

Material: 50% Modal, 45% Cotton, 5% Polyester – just an overall amazing combination. Soft, lightweight, a bit sleek, and just the right stretch to feel like a second skin.
Aesthetic: The sleek, solid color combined with black waistband featuring strong white text creates a look that exudes power and confidence without being overbearing in any way.
Waistband: I want to say it’s an overall very typical waistband, but it’s ever so more lightweight and stretchy that it feels like more than typical. Sits very nicely on or just below your waist.
Pouch: For having a pouch that’s defined by vertical seams and a vertical fly, it’s a surprisingly good shape – it’s advertised as a “contour pouch”, and while I wouldn’t go THAT far, you certainly have more support around and beneath your junk than you might expect of a traditional boxer-brief! And the fly here is great – there’s plenty of overlap, so you’re never at risk of “falling out”, but the fabric is light and stretchy enough that the fly is very easy-access, partially thanks to sufficiently long openings on either side. Often, boxer-briefs that use a fully vertical design instead of shaping more to the natural “V” of the hip/crotch region have the falling-out problem when they make the fly openings big enough for one-handed access – not this pair!
Backside: Soft and smooth, just like most of the pair! For as lightweight as it is, it still provides a nice bit of shape to your rear, too, with a nice curve underneath and a nice dip between your cheeks. There’s also no tag to ever get in your way.
Legs: Long enough for my liking, and the lightweight stretchiness that defines this pair keeps the legs skin"tight" without actually feeling tight at all – which extends all the way down to the hem as well.
Overall: 5/5 – I fell in love so hard with the first pair of these that I ordered that I almost immediately went and ordered two more pairs of the same. They just have the full package (no pun intended) – a comfortably soft, smooth, and lightweight fabric with the right stretch and right leg length, plus a great fly.
Great for: Everyday wear, Activewear, Loungewear
Good for: Sleepwear, Sexy wear(??), Sex wear(??)

Aussiebum – BodyDemin Hipster – Demin (Blue) – Medium

025

It’s high time to show off the pair in my avatar, right? I think using my 25th review, and the first post of a new month, is a proper place to make the highlight!

image

Material: 92% Polyester, 8% Elastane, and overall a wonderful feel. Lightweight, soft, very smooth/sleek, and almost with a slight cooling sensation(??) that’s very comfortable.
Aesthetic: Woof… Continuing on the established theme that I think the denim look is sexy, I absolutely love this pair. And if you think skinny jeans look better than normal jeans because they hug your form more… Well, you can’t get more form-hugging than underwear like this! Especially the rear view, hehheh. I love the back pocket, belt loops, front button, and “distressed” look with the holes. The thought that, from a distance, people might think you’re actually wearing jean shorts also seems very fun to me. At least until they notice just how nicely it hugs your backside or highlights your bulge…
Waistband: The waistband itself is fairly comfy, and sized very well. It’s a bit on the tall side, which makes sense since it’s imitating the waistband of a pair of jeans, but it can on rare occasion start feeling a little uncomfortable, especially if it folds over itself a little bit.
Pouch: Roomy and structured enough that it really highlights your bulge, creating a nice, almost-hammock like space for your junk to rest in. The overall material is really smooth, and the pouch itself has two layers of fabric there to reduce friction. The material is still really lightweight, though, so the pouch is really breathable even with two layers. A lot of designers like to say their underwear feels almost like not wearing underwear at all… I say this pouch is one of the few that actually feels that way.
Backside: Looooove how smooth it feels as it does a great job of hugging and contouring your cheeks. So much shape! The only little downside is how the tag is affixed on the waistband. It’s a fairly solid tag, and bigger because the waistband itself is kinda tall, so it’s occasionally noticeable especially if you somehow sit on it the wrong way. It’s kinda cool how the tag is offset from the center, though, so that the “outside tag” can happen and look all the more like a real pair of jeans.
Legs: Really does a nice job of (comfortably!) hugging your thighs in the same way the backside hugs your rump. They have a nice elasticity to keep everything from feeling too tight or too loose, which of course only really works if they’re sized nicely to begin with. And I’m a fan of the length on these, since they’re long enough that they never roll up on my giant thighs.  On that note: when I purchased this – both times, since I have two now – it was called the “LongLeg”, not the “Hipster”. It has apparently been renamed in the intervening years, and Aussiebum now offers a new “LongLeg” that goes basically all the way down to the knees. I have only become aware of this development while writing this review, so I’m really tempted to get the longer BodyDenim now…
Overall: 5/5 – I was tempted to knock it just a bit to 4.5/5 thanks to the waistband, but I honestly love the look, fabric, and cut too much to not give it my highest possible recommendation. As I said, I have two of these now. This is a great pair of underwear that would look great on about anyone. Highly, highly recommend!
Great for: Everyday wear, Loungewear, Sexy wear
Good for: Sleepwear, Activewear

image

U-Shark – Ultra Bulge Bikini Pouch – Rainbow – Single Size

024

Material: Unfortunately, the Amazon page where you can get this doesn’t list the material blend, nor does it have a tag, so I’m not going wager a guess, but it’s sufficiently soft.
Aesthetic: If the pouch design didn’t get your attention to begin with, then the rainbow fabric certainly will! It’s meant to be eye-catching, and it certainly is! I’m not sure how you draw more attention short of using neon and glitter. X-D
Pouch: The general construction of this pair is one slightly two-part sack explicitly for your balls and one longer sleeve for your willie. It’s a similar concept to the K’mando pouch in this respect, but aside from the massive material difference it also has a noticeable sizing difference, with this pair erring on the side of being potentially oversized instead of being potentially undersized. Even the opening favors being big rather than being small, relying on a drawstring to help it stay on (instead of being small enough that it naturally stays on but is hard to get in to). You can see that the drawstring causes the “lip” to bunch up a little bit, but it’s really not noticeable. The drawstring itself is on the long side and more whip-like than shoelace-like, which makes it a bit frustrating if you let it all dangle, but it works well to wrap it around your junk as an extra keep-it-on measure. Both the sleeve and the ball pouch will show whether or not you’re filling them out completely thanks to how the “corners” of each pouch are constructed. However, it looks and feels great when you are filling it out! Obviuously you don’t have as much control over your ball size than you do your dick size, but the ball pouch is less noticeable anyway, so it all works out.
Overall: 2.5/5 – definitely a fun pouch to own if you like being a bit silly and show-off-ish! Just probably not one that’s worth really seeking out in terms of practicality and over-the-top design. Still comfy, of course.
Great for: Sleepwear
Good for: Sexy wear, Sex wear, Activewear

brunomenswear:

#NewArrivals #BrunoMensWear 2018 Collection

¡Conócela!
👉 👉 https://goo.gl/fbFMoN 👈 👈

¡Estas a un #Click de ESTRENAR! 😎

Compra AHORA en nuestra tienda en línea: 🛒💳
www.brunomenswear.com.mx
#Whatsapp 📲 2711245213

Hacemos envíos a TODO México y el resto del mundo. 📦 🚚 ✈️ 📭

#underwear #swimwear #bikini #thong #jockstrap #boxer #meggings #tanktop #tshirt #trajedebaño #ropainterior #hombres #brunomenswear #cordoba #veracruz #mexico #productomexicano #hechoenmexico #fotografiamexicana #MexicoAlternativo #male #moda #man #sixpack #men #modaunderwear (en Córdoba, Veracruz)

Bruno showed a different view of this getup over here, but I like the above view better. ;3 Anyway, like the previous full-body pair reblog review from Bruno that I did, they’re surprising me with how much they’re making me want these harness-inspired items… Still loving the jockstrap-style seat, and really loving the open-hip design; the stark white straps are also just stunning here. Again, Bruno making me want some. X-D

Not much of a review here, but I haven’t heard of Express as a brand before! So I thank this cute guy for introducing me. =-) Unfortunately, he’s wearing an all-black pair, so the picture loses all hints of definition. As such, I can’t say much about the pair aside from the fact that it looks comfortable enough, even if the legs aren’t quite as long as I’d like. Can I get this pair and the guy in them please? =-)

Joe Boxer – Classic Cotton Boxer – White – Medium

023

image

Material: 100% Cotton and soft as you’d expect it! (You might suggest it’s a function of this pair’s pre-collection age, but it has always been super-soft.)
Aesthetic: You can’t really go wrong with a classic white, plus a true Joe Boxer vintage white-waistband-with-bold-black-text waistband – unless, of course, the pair has aged to the point of looking thin and ragged, which this pair somewhat has. Still, if you can get your hands on a crisp, fresh pair of classic white boxer-briefs like this pair, I’d say go for it!
Waistband: Feeling-wise, what you expect of most waistbands. Sits right up at or beneath the waist; good size.
Pouch: The one downside for having a truly classic white (boxer) brief look is that there’s essentially no shape whatsoever to the pouch – it’s super flat. The one upside to this pair is that it’s not entirely a true traditional vertical fly – the inner fly opening is a looser, non-trimmed horizontal opening not unlike the inner fly opening in the Jack Adams Core Cycle Trunk. However, while the inner opening of the fly has easy access, the outer opening is NOT, at least not by design. The opening is small and attaches too far up the “V” structure of the brief, making this more similar to the AC Tagless Brief. At least, it was – as you can see from the photos below, I’ve made a modification to the pair. Back in my late teens, I was as annoyed with the inaccessible fly opening as I am now, but I still loved the overall feel of the pair and the inner fly opening, so I decided to take a pair of scissors to the pair. Snip snip! You can see now that the right and left “triangles” formed by the trim/piping are no longer the same size. I wouldn’t do this to any pair I’ve purchased recently, or at least any pair that’s worth more than $6 or $8 – I think this is only a real option for underwear that you’d buy in bulk and isn’t designed to stand out.

image

Backside: Like the front, rather flat, though there’s at least a slight curve between the legs.
Legs: At this point in time, they’re getting worn and loose, but they were similar to the Core Cycle Trunk originally, if a bit shorter.
Overall: 2.5/5 – I do love sleeping in these, and they’re good to wear for a day in the office as well, but they’re really hard to find at this point, (the closest I’ve found are here,)and you can do sooooo much better pouch-wise anyway.
Great for: Sleepwear
Good for: Everyday wear, Loungewear

Jack Adams – Core Cycle Trunk – Orange – Medium

022

image

Material: 60% Cotton, 40% Polyester, but all you feel is the cotton, so it’s a really nice, traditional feel IMO.
Aesthetic: A strong solid color is complimented by a bold white waistband with black text and a slim black stripe all the way around.
Waistband: Overall, very comfy typical waistband that sits below the waist.
Pouch: In my mind, there are three main things to think about when designing the front of men’s underwear: keeping everything comfortable & separate, promoting your package (physically and aesthetically), and granting ease of access when nature calls. Unfortunately, it’s often very hard to balance all three, specifically balancing the third against the first two. Why? Well, if you want to make a fly, the historically you either have to include two layers of overlapping fabric (the traditional vertical fly on classic whitey tighties) which would generally promote flatness from the extra layer, or have an optionally closable slit on a flat front (the sometimes-buttoned fly of true boxer shorts) which is flat because having such an opening in a contoured pair would just have your junk falling out all the time. Many designers are just forgoing the fly nowadays since most men don’t use flies anyway. Brands have also tried traditional vertical flies with highly contoured pouches, which I’ve already detailed as somewhat defeating the point because those flies are nearly impossible to navigate, (certainly can’t be done one-handed,) and often hurt to have your dick sticking through. Well, the horizontal (“H”) fly is one really, really great way to eliminate the “fly challenge”. An H-Fly is inherently easy to navigate, (assuming neither limiting hem is too stiff,) and it allows the lower panel of the fly to still be a single-layer, nicely shaped section of fabric – and Jack Adams’ Core line is an amazing example of a H-fly. Like the AC brief linked above, the inside hem of the fly is simply a semi-loose trim-/pipe-less edge of fabric, and the outside hem isn’t so high to make it difficult to use (unlike the AC brief where the outside hem is too far right). And while I’ve had some athletic boxer briefs from Jockey that also have H-flies, this Jack Adams pair had a much more contoured pouch, plus was made from a much more “everyday” fabric than the Jockey pairs were. This combination was why I ultimately bought three more Core pairs – another Cycle Trunk, a shorter-legged Boxer Brief, and some Long Johns (which unfortunately compromised the lower support of the pouch somewhat).

image

Backside: Nothing incredible about the backside here, but it’s just tight enough to give you a bit of shape. The vertical center seam comes in just a bit, too.
Legs: Very good length, IMO, and also just tight enough to not feel uncomfortable while still staying up against your skin. I mentioned the Boxer Brief earlier, which is still nice in most manners, but the legs on that pair are short enough that they roll up often and actually do start feeling tight around my thighs.
Overall: 4.5/5 – the only reasons I don’t give this the full 5/5 “I totally recommend this!” is that 1) I can see some people note liking the fabric, and 2) I can’t recommend that something that’s no longer available! I’m highly frustrated about that second point. At the very least, it seems that Jack Adams is making new trunks and new boxer briefs that have very similar cuts to the Core line, though none with the 60% Cotton/40% Polyester blend.
Great for: Everyday wear, Loungewear, Sexy wear
Good for: Activewear, Sleepwear, Sex wear

image