Just a guy sharing his love for underwear of all kinds!
No clue at all what brand these boxers are, but I think they look nice! They’re a very traditional look, with a simple pattern on what appears to be a slightly stiffer, sheet-ier kind of fabric – definitely not the traditional briefs-style fabric or a super-soft, almost-formless cotton. I imagine it’s almost a little slick to the touch, in a way. The waistband also looks like it could be a little on the crinkle-y side, especially with the kind of fabric I’m thinking of.
I have a pair of boxers myself from Jockey that I think are comparable to this pair in terms of fabric, but it’s just a guess. It’s the kind of boxers you might think of for a 9-to-5 office-worker kind of stereotype. (My Jockey boxers even have a button-close pocket in back! A bit weird, but kinda fun.)
Even if the fabric is a little on the stiffer side, these boxers were apparently designed with enough of a front to give a fairly good look to the pouch here as this daddy is wearing it! He definitely seems to be providing a nice shape up front, and he looks comfortable wearing it too, which is of course always the most important part. It kinda looks like the pair has a fly, but it’s hard to tell exactly; between the angle and the lighting, I can’t see an obvious button, and the fly isn’t obviously semi-open either, which can often happen with boxers and similar things when the way you’re standing causes the two halves of the fly to fold differently.
And with that last AussieBum review, I’m going to be taking a break from reviewing my own pairs for a little while, as stated in a previous announcement. I will still be doing my reblog reviews on the Tuesday/Thursday/Saturday schedule, so you’ll still be getting underwear pictures, no worries! When I start back up, hopefully in March, I’ll launch my sales page. I’ve got over 40 pairs I already want to sell, and will probably get more as I set things up! Hope you all enjoy. =-)
Material: 90% Polyester, 10% Elastane, all in a very breathable and stretchy soft mesh fabric! It feels a hint synthetic, though not anywhere near annoyingly so, and it’s definitely a lower-friction material. Aesthetic: Sporty, and a bit naughty! Peekaboo holes in both the front and back definitely give the feeling of enticing closer looks, with that classic red/white/black combo I mentioned with the Breedwell brief the other week (and a similar mesh, too!). Loud and athletic, I can absolutely see a confident guy shamelessly parading around a gym locker room in these – or a bedroom. Waistband: Pretty typical – good height, soft and stretchy enough. The lower hem, where most of the connective stitching is, is ever so slightly tighter and less stretchy than the rest of the waistband, but it’s no big deal. The waistband sits a little low, so if you’re like me with a bit of extra skin around that area, you might notice the waistband a bit more. Typical AussieBum big-panel tag in the back, with the associated possible scratchy-corner issues. Pouch: Pretty nice! With the peekaboo window removing fabric and providing extra structure up near the waistband, general wear for this pair is more intended for a willie-down setup, and the pouch is shaped accordingly. Even as the mesh is fairly soft to the touch and generally forgiving for however you want to point, the overall pouch holds its shape quite well, keeping your junk forward (away from your thighs) fairly nicely. And yes, the peekaboo window is big, comfy, and stretchy enough for use as a fly if desired! Backside: Fun look overall, I think! Of course, the peekaboo window is always enjoyable, and the red piping around the window and legs gives some nice, almost elegant curves to look at. Definitely not a “full-coverage” pair, as the backs of the leg openings go across the cheeks instead of reliably come up under them. The only small downside is that, even with the mesh theoretically helping with lighting and reveals, the black of the fabric just visually eliminates any shape for your rear. Legs: Nothing of note here! Comfy and motion-friendly enough. Overall: 5/5 – this pair is very similar to the Breedwell brief, except it’s more geared toward actual athletic activity instead of everyday wear, such that the comparative pros and cons balance out completely with the intended function in mind, so I think it makes sense to have it the same rating. Obviously, one or the other will be better depending on what you’re looking for in your briefs! Great for: Activewear, Sexy wear, Sex wear(?) Good for: Everyday wear
Thinking of summer looking at swim briefs!
They say that vertical lines make you look taller… I’d wager that it still holds true even with such short stripes as those on these swim briefs! They also draw my eye to the v-lines on everyone here… Well, except for the one guy in back who’s showing off his bubble butt instead (the vertical lines helping show off the shape there too!) X-D
Fun mix of colors here! These seem a bit too low-rise for me to be socially comfortable wearing them, but they don’t look to tight overall or anything like that, so I bet they’d be fairly comfortable for those who want to rock the look!
Material: 90% Cotton, 10% Elastane, and incredibly smooth and comfy! Now, after the first trip through the wash, the pair lost a little bit of its sleekness and such, but this is splitting hairs – it’s still quite lightweight and relatively low-friction as cotton blends go. Great amount of stretch. The only drawback to this fabric is that it seems to like to (visually) bunch up a lot – it took forever to get good pictures even though I never needed to provide any significant stretching to make the fabric lie flat on me (and could never get it perfect in the back view). Aesthetic: Really playful! I love the flower print. Honestly, I had wanted the pink version instead of this red (and blue) version, but I still love the look. In addition to the print pattern, there are a bunch of seams on this pair that you don’t really feel at all but can definitely see, helping to visually emphasize the pouch, length of the legs from the front, and the curve of your cheeks in back. Waistband: Fairly typical! Not much to say. Pouch: Such a good pouch… Nicely shaped so that it’s separate from the thighs, sticks out forward enough, and the give of the fabric gives a nice amount of motion without feeling loose at all. Honestly, similar to the BodyDenim pair I reviewed a long time ago. Backside: Very nice! The print pattern and seams give it a bunch of visual interest, and I think the seams also help shape the backside well, giving it a nicely round look. There’s also an impressive separation between your cheeks with this pair! Don’t worry, it doesn’t feel like a wedgie at all – just looks a bit like it (in a good way)! Legs: Despite being called a “trunk”, the legs here actually have a nice length IMO (and, to be fair, in the item description on the site, it says “brief and long leg styles”, so I guess this is actually one of the “long leg”s). Overall: 5/5 – while I’m not sure if this pair rises to the level of being a “favorite”, I can’t really find anything wrong with this pair either! Heck, it’s overall very similar to the BodyDenim I mentioned earlier, which was also a 5/5 and a favorite, with an honestly better waistband now to boot… I guess this pair will probably join the ranks of favorites for me soon, it’s just not well-established in my mind yet. Great for: Everyday wear, Loungewear, Sexy wear Good for: Sleepwear, Activewear
Material: 98% Cotton, 2% Viscose, which is SUPER SOFT OMG. The thing is, while it’s super soft and somewhat stretchy, it’s not super stretchy by any means. This means that the “tapered design” can cause some issues depending on your proportions… But it will always feel amazing even if the fit isn’t great. Aesthetic: I mean, they’re grey trackies/sweatpants… We all know what grey sweatpants are good for. 8) This pair in particular is designed for a bit more of an athletic look, with less bulk and a tighter fit, and I think it pulls that off quite well – almost too well! Waistband: Tall and sleek with a tube through the middle of the waistband for the drawstring. A bit tight at times, but in an all-around way that doesn’t ever fell like it’s cutting into you at all; just generally snug I guess. Quite comfy honestly. Pouch: Normally I’d say this is N/A for outerwear pants, because they’re generally designed to be flat thanks to the assumption that you’re wearing underwear beneath… But these are grey trackies we’re talking about, of course! The joke is that you go commando and show off a bit. ;3 The overall more-skintight design of these sweatpants means that you aren’t going to have anything flopping about at all, but that’s fine. The fabric is so soft that the snugness is still pretty damn comfortable. That said, I recommend wearing a C-ring of some sort, whether you want to be showing off your religion or not, because you’re probably going to want something lessen the amount of skin-on-skin contact between your junk and your legs that otherwise results from the revealing fit. I personally chose to wear an elastic C-strap that came with one of my older Mckillop bulge pairs. Backside: There isn’t much of an ass to these pants, at least not by design; if you already have a good solid backside to show off, these sweats will do a good job of showing it off, but the softer your cheeks are, the more flattened-out you’ll look with these. Still, the tightness will still hold a nice curve even if you are a softer guy! So that’s night (but again it works better if you’re naturally more cake-y). And that all said, if you have curvy hips, it will show those of AMAZINGLY well! The backside also has a bit of visual interest with a back pocket on the right cheek. There is a tag in the back of the waistband that’s fairly large, but it’s not noticeable at all, and pretty soft. Legs: The legs are the most telling part of these trackies to me. As mentioned above, they were designed with a “tapered design” in mind, I guess with the waist being the widest part of the person wearing them: from promotional material, they’re supposed to be only moderately snug on the hips and thighs, relatively loose around the knees, and then fairly skintight around the calves. I, clearly, am not the intended body type though! My hips and ass are far thicker than my waist, and my thighs are pretty big as well, so what happens when I pull them on is that they become skintight around my everything, which then prevents the bottom hems of the pants from coming up as high as they should because of how much they hug my calves, making the loosest part be a clumpy-ish grouping around my ankles. (Side note: the ankle openings are also difficult to get stretched over my actual ankles!) As moderately difficult it is to get them on, once they are on they are still quite comfy. They don’t look like they’re promoted to, but I still like the look anyway, so despite my apparent complaints above I do still quite like them all-around! While skintight, they aren’t constricting at all, and of course the material is very soft, especially on the inside. Other: Like the SupaDupa brief… Who the F is naming these things? It’s like an old cartoon the way they name some of these products… Plus, TrackyDak also sounds a bit too much like Tricky Dick to my liking. Oh well! Overall: 4/5 – I don’t want to knock these too much for the sizing issues, because aside from those, these are an amazing pair of sweatpants! I wonder if they would have been noticeably different around the thighs and calves if I had ordered a large instead of a medium… Great for: Activewear, Sexy wear Good for: Loungewear, Everyday wear, Sleepwear(?)
This just came across my FB feed, and I’m honestly kinda tempted just because of the moneybags placement… X’-D
Popping with PUMP! Here we have a bold boxer-brief/trunk, which is a but surprising to say for a pair that’s mostly white, but I think you can see why this pair is so visually stunning. The three colors involved are all quite crisp, and the paneling makes your eyes instantly focus on the orange pouch (and inner thighs, it seems).
The fabric looks fairly comfortable – if I had to wager a guess, probably some cotton blend. The waistband also looks similar. At least, even if it’s a different material, it looks pretty comfortable as well. It’s also sitting quite low on the model’s hips here…
The one thing I don’t 100% like about this picture is that the lighting combines with the orange and the angle to make it hard to really discern the shape of the pouch, even with the black seam going down the front. I think I can see some anatomy contours on our right, so I’m guessing the pouch is actually fairly deep and well-shaped as well as being comfortably snug, but it’s still a bit hard to tell. At the very least, the outer fly opening looks fairly tall, so I would hope it’s a nicely functional pair in that regard!
I’ve reblogged a PUMP! pair once before, and even though I said I really need to try the brand out, I still haven’t done so… I really need to fix that soon.
Material: 68% Nylon, 25% Polyester, 7% Spandex, at least according to the website, but it says 50% Cotton, 22% Nylon, 20% Polyester, 8% Elastane on the pair itself, which is a surprisingly large difference – with the Cotton, that is (remember that Spandex and Elastane are two names for the same thing). Whatever it’s made of, this fabric is lovingly stretchy – even though the cut is very square, the fabric basically conforms to your body and anatomy in an incredible hug that in now way is uncomfortably tight or whatever else you might expect for something that draws in a lot. This pair reminds me very much of three seamless trunks I bought a long time ago from Knocker (and are still available!) that was advertised as one-size-fits-all, and surprisingly those fit both an XL friend of mine and an S friend of mine, both friends finding the pairs comfy and good-looking on them. The fabric on those pairs was 90% Nylon, 10% Spandex, which felt just a hair thicker and less breathable than the AussieBum fabric here, but that would be me splitting hairs; I’m not sure if the different mix for this AussieBum pair limits its size-flexibility, but I would not be surprised. If you look very closely at the pair, you’ll notice that there’s a different stitching style across different parts in a way that defines where the pouch is in front and where the cheeks are in back. Aesthetic: Stripes is always a fun look, and the specific somewhat-faded shades of red and blue here provide a look that’s both laid-back and a “loud pop” at the same time. The fact that the waistband blends smoothly into the rest of the pair makes it look less like underwear, giving it a swimwear or even a bodypaint look, both of which are quite nice. There are many other BodyStretch trunks available, all with wildly different color schemes to fit whatever mood you want! Waistband: As mentioned above, it blends very much into the rest of the pair because it’s the same fabric throughout – there is nothing that separates the white fabric of the waistband from the white background of the fabric lower down aside from the slight difference in stitching pattern mentioned earlier. Nothing extra added to the waistband at all; the comfortable grip of the fabric itself is enough to hold the pair on nicely. The information that would normally be on a tag is instead printed on the inside of the back part of the waistband, which along with the print text of “AussieBum” on the outside of the front, is the only obvious was to tell what is and isn’t the waistband. Pouch: Unlike the Knockers I compared this to above, which are totally flat, there is some definition to the pouch on this pair, with just enough extra fabric (in a slightly different stitching) for the pouch to come forward a little bit. I’m not sure if that effort from AussieBum was needed or effective, as the nature of the fabric itself makes it hug to and conform around your junk, making its own amazing pouch anyway. This means it both holds you in place, but allows you to move as much as you want, because it just lets you move while always conforming as necessary. Really, it feels incredible (I had a bit of trouble getting proper pictures because I was, ah, reacting to the pouch a bit too much most of the time).
Backside: Nice to look at with all the stripes here! The two-color gradient provides a nice effect for where the overall curve of your cheeks are. There’s also a nice bit of shaping with the separation curve between the legs near the bottom of your cheeks. As noted above, there is a very slight difference in the stitching to help “set” your cheeks into the pair, which I think is a nice touch. Legs: The legs on this are a bit short, which (for me) means they’re likely to roll up. When not rolled, the stretchiness of the fabric makes the leg openings amazing; when they roll up, it can be hit or miss, especially depending on just how much rolling you get, but it’s generally not an issue. On occasion, though, you definitely will want to readjust and unroll those “hems”, which could be a tad awkward in public settings. Overall: 4.5/5 – even with the occasional leg rolling issue, I absolutely love this pair. It’s unique and incredibly comfortable, and a nice look as well. Honestly I was thinking about going the full 5/5, but I think I have to give at least the smaller knock for the leg thing. Also, I still don’t know exactly what’s going on with the fabric definition… Great for: Loungewear, Sleepwear Sexy wear Good for: Everyday wear
Material: 90% Nylon, 10% Elastane, for the body of the pair – the “trim” (i.e. waistband maybe?) is listed as 90% Polyester, 10% Elastane. While it’s obviously not cotton, it’s not obviously synthetic either, and quite soft with a good stretch. There’s also a mesh-like material in the crotch, which is something we also saw with all threeVeni Massepairs for ventilation, which I’ll discuss more in the Pouch section. Aesthetic: It’s a playful, bright shade of blue, so I don’t mind the solid color through the body of the pair. The red-white-and-blue striped waistband with the stylized AussieBum logo adds just enough of a pop to up the visual interest of the pair, especially on the playful aspect. This absolutely feels like a pair you might wear to the pool or the beach if you happened to forget an actual pair of swim briefs. (I wouldn’t go swimming in these, just because of the fabric type, though!) Waistband: A little more solidly-built that other waistbands I’ve seen, but otherwise pretty typical in terms of height, stretch, etc. The waistband sits right at the hips with a midrise look. Like with many AussieBum pairs, the tag is a huge panel-sized affair that is generally soft itself, but has the corners feel somewhat tough and pointy/scratchy. For this pair, I trimmed those corners off within an hour of trying on the pair the first time. Pouch: The two stand-out features of this pair are the C-ring built into the fabric and the ventilation feature between the legs. Not only is there a section of mesh between the legs, but the outer layer of pouch fabric is open between the legs as well, allowing for even more air flow down there. The pouch outer layer even folds back up a little bit, almost as if there was an attempt to make it a second pouch. However, this is not what I’d call a “dual pouch” pair of underwear like many of my recent reviews. First, the upper hem of this folded-up section of fabric is incredibly low in the pair; you would need to have some impressively-low hangers and a long-while-soft willie for this mini-pouch to provide any separation, and of course you would still have a large amount of skin-on-skin contact between your willie and balls above. Also, the C-ring-like hole in the inner layer of pouch fabric is large enough for all of your junk, which is unlike most dual-pouch underwear that has a pouch for your balls and a smaller hole for just your willie to go through.
This pair is more like the AC Retro Pop brief, which I’ve surprisingly only ever done as a reblog review and haven’t done with my own pairs (of which I have several). This is perfectly fine on its own, of course; it still pulls the balls away from your thighs, which I think is the bigger issue for skin-on-skin contact, and it helps promote your junk up and forward as most C-rings do, so that’s nice. The fact that this pseudo-C-ring is just the existing fabric (like the Retro Pop) means that the hem is relatively soft and comfortable, which is always good. Backside: Not much to speak of back here! Solid expanse of blue, but nicely reigned in I think. Not quite full coverage, as there’s a hint of cheek peeking out underneath – or at least the cheek-thigh fold – while the hip straps have a middling height. Also a hint of a lift between the legs. Legs: Nothing remarkable here either! They’re not exemplary, but they’re definitely comfortable. Other: Just my opinion, but whoever picked the name “SupaDupa” needs to have their head examined, like yikes… Overall: 3.5/5 – I like this pair a lot, but it doesn’t knock anything out of the park. It’s not a 4 because of A) the tag issue and B) the built-in C-ring makes it take a few more seconds and adjustments to pull up each time. Still, nice brief for sure! Great for: Everyday wear, Sexy wear Good for: Loungewear, Sleepwear